A family perspective
Young Brides and Young Mothers: Three Centuries of Malott Women
How old were the women of this family when they married, and when their first child was born? Did the answer change between Gideon’s day and our grandparents’? The dates gathered on this site are enough to take a first look.
How this was worked out
For every woman on the site with a known year of birth, we looked for two things: the year she married, and the year her first known child was born. Subtracting her birth year gives her age at each. Thirty-five women have a usable age at a first child and twenty-one a usable age at marriage, from Marie Martijn, Gideon’s wife, born in 1622, to women born in the 1930s. They are the Malott daughters and the women who married into the family, the other half of every family.
Because only years are used, any single age may be off by one. To keep a few unusual records from pulling the results around, the tables below use the median, the middle value when the ages are lined up in order.
What the dates show
Age at first known childAge at marriage
| Women born | Age at first known child | Age at marriage |
|---|---|---|
| 1600s | 23 (5 women) | 22 (5) |
| 1700–1779 | 20 (5) | 18½ (6) |
| 1780–1819 | 22* (6 of 13) | — |
| 1820–1869 | 20 (7) | 19 (5) |
| 1870–1935 | 19 (5) | 18 (5) |
| All periods | 21 (35) | 19 (21) |
Median ages. *For women born 1780–1819 the figure uses only the six families with four or more recorded children; counting all thirteen gives 25, for the reason explained below. No marriage dates are recorded for women born in those years.
The striking thing is how little changed. Across three hundred years, from Huguenot refugees in New Amsterdam to farm families in Ohio and Illinois, the typical woman in this family married at about 18 to 21 and had her first child at about 20 to 23. Where both dates are known, the first child usually arrived within a year or two of the wedding.
The family also ran a little young. United States census figures put the typical American woman’s age at first marriage at about 22 in 1890 and 20 to 21 by the 1950s. The women on this site generally married a year or two earlier than that.
The earliest generation was not the youngest. Gideon’s wife Marie Martijn married at 22, and Marie Bellemain, the wife of Jean Pierre Mellot, at about 30, a pattern typical of the Dutch and French Protestant families of the time, who often waited to marry until a couple could set up a household of their own. The youngest marriages came in two clusters: among women born around the time of the Revolution, and again among those born in the early 1900s.
Married before twenty
More than a third of the women with usable dates married, became mothers, or both, before they turned twenty.
| Woman | Born | Married | Age |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Ann Tracy | 1735 | 1750 | 15 |
| Mildred Adams | 1910 | 1926 | 16 |
| Christine Peters | c. 1658 | 1675 | about 17 |
| Mary M. Quackenbush | 1753 | 1770 | 17 |
| Hannah Malott | 1765 | 1782 | 17 |
| Laura (Lora) Malott | 1850 | 1867 | 17 |
| Annie Luiza South | 1904 | 1921 | 17 |
| Eharine Carmen Jeffers | 1903 | 1921 | 18 |
| Mary Wanda Malott | 1931 | 1949 | 18 |
| Christina Jones Marllatt | 1827 | 1846 | 19 |
| Lou Ann Stratton | 1863 | 1882 | 19 |
Sarah Ann Tracy, who married Peter Malott at about fifteen, went on to raise a large family before she and several of her children were captured on the Ohio River around 1780 (see Captured on the Ohio). Mildred Adams married at sixteen in 1926 and had her first child the next year.
The records also give Hanna Howe a marriage at fifteen in 1701, but her first recorded child was not born until 1716. Children born in between are probably missing, so she is left out of the tables and figures here.
Mothers before twenty
| Woman | Born | First known child | Age |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mary A. (surname unknown) | 1823 | 1839 | 16 |
| Elizabeth McBroom | 1837 | 1854 | 17 |
| Laura (Lora) Malott | 1850 | 1867 | 17 |
| Mildred Adams | 1910 | 1927 | 17 |
| Sarah Ann Tracy | 1735 | 1753 | 18 |
| Abigail Mellott | 1786 | 1804 | 18 |
| Elizabeth Marlatt | 1809 | 1827 | 18 |
| Mary M. Quackenbush | 1753 | 1772 | 19 |
| Elizabeth “Betsy” Mellot | 1784 | 1803 | 19 |
| Eharine Carmen Jeffers | 1903 | 1922 | 19 |
| Annie Luiza South | 1904 | 1923 | 19 |
Laura (Lora) Malott married and had her first child in the same year, 1867, when she was seventeen.
What the numbers can’t tell us
- “First known child” is only the first child on record. Babies who died in infancy often went unrecorded, especially before 1800, so the true age at a first birth was probably a little younger than shown.
- Some families are only partly recorded. Three women born between 1784 and 1801 show only one or two children, born when they were 37 to 43. Their earlier children are almost certainly missing, which is why the 1780–1819 figure uses only the better-documented families.
- The groups are small. Each period has only five to thirteen women, so one woman can move a median by a year.
- A few dates are probably wrong. Four records were set aside: Jeanne Robbe, whose estimated birth year would make her a bride at eleven; Elizabeth Morgan, whose first child is dated three years before her marriage; Elizabeth Willcox, whose only recorded child would have been born when she was 57; and Hanna Howe, above.
- Many women have no birth year. About seventy mothers on the site, most of them wives who married into the family, have no known year of birth and could not be counted.
Every new birth or marriage date makes this picture sharper. If you have a date for one of the women on this site, especially a wife recorded only by her first name, please get in touch.
